Try confidential stablecoin payments live
Experience how easy it is to move funds privately while preserving auditability through selective disclosure. Create your own stablecoin or select an existing one. Choose an amount, press send and control who can see the transaction details.
Why most privacy systems break and Hathor doesn’t?
___
Businesses don’t need anonymity.
They need control over information and a simple operation.
What makes Hathor structurally different?
1. Privacy for any token, not just the native asset
This is the single most important differentiation. Monero and Zcash, the two most established privacy protocols, only support privacy for their native tokens. You cannot do a private transfer of a stablecoin or a tokenized security on either. Liquid supports multi-asset confidential transactions, but it is a federated sidechain with limited smart contract capabilities. Railgun and Arcium/Umbra support EVM tokens and Solana tokens respectively, but both are application-layer wrappers requiring shield/unshield flows. Hathor’s confidential transactions work at the protocol level for any token on the network, including custom tokens and tokenized assets. For developers building private payment products or institutions doing private RWA transfers, this matters directly.
2. No shielded pool, no pool contamination risk
Railgun, Umbra and Tornado Cash all route transactions through shared anonymity pools. If illicit funds enter the pool, even briefly, the pool becomes permanently tainted from a compliance perspective. There is no on-chain clawback path. For regulated payment processors and financial institutions, this is a structural dealbreaker. Hathor’s confidential transactions transfer directly between addresses without a pool intermediary. This is not a regulatory talking point. It is a fundamental architectural difference with concrete compliance implications.
3. One address type, no shielding/deshielding UX
Zcash has historically struggled with low shielded adoption because two address types create friction, confusion and operational errors. Hathor’s design uses a single address type that supports both transparent and confidential transactions. The wallet manages transitions automatically. Users never interact with shielding or deshielding concepts. Combined with the ability to pay fees using the same transferred asset, this creates a materially simpler operational experience at scale.
4. Three-level compliance toolkit, designed as a product
. Monero has no meaningful compliance tooling. . Zcash is still evolving viewing-key functionality. . Railgun offers “Proofs of Innocence” through SDK-level tooling. Hathor introduces: - Transaction-level proof of payment - Address-level auditing keys - Wallet-level auditing keys All exposed as operational product features, not cryptographic primitives. The difference between “developer tooling” and “a compliance officer sharing view access with a regulator” is the difference between a capability and a usable financial product.
